Order:
  1.  2
    Historical myths define group boundaries: A mathematical sketch and evidence from Ukraine.Matthew R. Zefferman & Paul E. Smaldino - 2024 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 47:e196.
    The authors' proposal for the evolutionary origins of historical myths does not hold up to scrutiny, as illustrated by a simple mathematical model. Group-level explanations, such as defining the conditions for in-group membership, are dismissed by the authors but are far more plausible, as illustrated by the ongoing war in Ukraine.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  20
    Integrating models of cognition and culture will require a bit more math.Matthew R. Zefferman & Paul E. Smaldino - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43.
    We support the goal to integrate models of culture and cognition. However, we are not convinced that the free energy principle and Thinking Through Other Minds will be useful in achieving it. There are long traditions of modeling both cultural evolution and cognition. Demonstrating that FEP or TTOM can integrate these models will require a bit more math.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  22
    Many important group-level traits are institutions.Matthew R. Zefferman & Peter J. Richerson - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3):280-281.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark